top of page

Best Agencies for Google Shopping Ads: The Profit-Driven Evaluator Framework

  • Writer: Chris Avery
    Chris Avery
  • Nov 17
  • 9 min read

Finding the “best agency for Google Shopping ads” is not about who shouts the highest ROAS in their case studies.


If you run an ecommerce brand, you do not get to spend ROAS. You spend cash and you keep profit.


This guide gives you a practical, profit-first way to evaluate Google Shopping and Performance Max agencies. You will learn:


  • Why ROAS alone can hide unprofitable campaigns

  • How to use POAS (profit on ad spend) and margin data in your agency selection

  • 7 concrete criteria to judge any Google Shopping agency

  • Red flags that suggest your current partner is burning margin

  • How JudeLuxe applies this in practice as a profit-driven ecommerce PPC agency


Where relevant, we link to official Google resources and independent references, so you can fact-check the technical bits as you go. Google Help+1


Why “best Google Shopping agency” is the wrong question

Most comparison articles rank agencies on:

  • Awards

  • Client logos

  • Headline ROAS numbers

  • Package prices

None of that tells you if they can:

  • Protect your margins

  • Engineer profitable Performance Max campaigns

  • Handle SKU complexity and varied profit profiles

  • Scale spend without destroying contribution margin


The better question is:

“Which agency can consistently turn my ad spend into profitable, scalable growth on Google Shopping and PMax?”

To answer that, you need a framework that starts from your P&L, then works backwards into campaign structure, feed architecture and bidding.

That is what the Profit-Driven Evaluator Framework is for.



ROAS vs POAS: why most “great results” are quietly unprofitable

Google’s own documentation on Shopping ads makes it clear: the system optimises to conversion value and goals you specify, not your true profit. Google Help+1

If you only give it revenue, you will get more revenue. Not necessarily more profit.

ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) only tells you:

Revenue ÷ Ad spend

It ignores:

  • Cost of goods

  • Shipping and packaging

  • Discounts and returns

  • Payment fees

  • Overheads

POAS (Profit on Ad Spend) goes further:

(Revenue − Total variable costs) ÷ Ad spend

Two campaigns can have the same 5x ROAS and wildly different POAS:

  • Campaign A: 5x ROAS, low margins, POAS 1.1x

  • Campaign B: 5x ROAS, high margins, POAS 2.5x

A good Google Shopping agency will:

  • Ask for your margin data

  • Structure campaigns around profitability tiers

  • Report profit contribution, not just revenue contribution


JudeLuxe formalises this in a signal-based, profit-first approach that explicitly prioritises POAS over vanity metrics like ROAS. JudeLuxe+1

If an agency cannot explain how they would calculate and use POAS in your account, they are not “best” in any useful sense.


The Profit-Driven Evaluator Framework

Use this framework to decide if an agency is actually built for profit-driven Shopping and PMax, or just dressing up standard setups.


Pillar 1: Measurement and strategy

Ask:

  • Do they work with POAS and contribution margin, not just ROAS and revenue?

  • Can they map Google Shopping and PMax to your P&L, LTV and inventory strategy?

  • Do they have a documented approach to incrementality, not just last-click attribution?

Good agencies will reference:

  • Google’s own guidance on goal-based campaigns and value-based bidding Google Help+1

  • How they adjust targets based on margin tiers and new customer vs returning customer


Pillar 2: PMax and Shopping engineering, not autopilot

Performance Max is powerful, but also a black box if you leave it alone. Industry commentary has repeatedly flagged concerns about transparency and over-reliance on AI-driven media buying. Wall Street Journal+1

Ask agencies:

  • How do you structure PMax asset groups and listing groups?

  • How do you prevent low-margin products from stealing budget in PMax?

  • What first-party signals and offline conversions do you feed back to Google?

A serious partner will talk about:

  • Asset groups built around margin, category, AOV and lifecycle role

  • Offline conversion imports and value rules for higher-value events

  • Clear separation between acquisition, cross-sell and retention roles

You can cross-reference the basics using Google’s own PMax documentation. Google Help+1


Pillar 3: Feed and data systems

Google Shopping relies on your product data in Merchant Center. Titles, images, prices, product types and custom labels all feed the system. Google Help+2Google Help+2

Ask:

  • Who owns feed quality – you, them, or a specialist team?

  • How do they structure product_type and custom labels for bidding?

  • Can they show you a feed template with profit tiers and lifecycle roles already built in?

If they treat the feed as a static export rather than a controllable system, you will hit a ceiling fast.


Pillar 4: Commercial alignment and transparency

Finally, ask:

  • How do you get paid – fixed fee, percentage of spend, performance component?

  • Which KPIs go on page one of the report?

  • How do you handle “good ROAS, poor profit” situations?

You want an agency whose published positioning and content matches this profit-first view, not just whoever has the nicest “Our values” page.

For example, JudeLuxe’s about page and thought leadership explicitly position the agency around margin, structure and profit-focused systems, not just clever creative. JudeLuxe+2JudeLuxe+2


Seven criteria to judge any Google Shopping agency

Here is a practical checklist you can use while shortlisting.

1. Profit measurement built in

  • Can they show sample reports that include POAS, gross profit and margin tiers, not just ROAS and CPA?

  • Do they have a clear process for ingesting your margin and cost data?

2. Profit-tiered campaign architecture

Ask to see:

  • Campaigns separated by margin tier (for example A/B/C)

  • Separate profit roles: Acquisition, Volume, Retention, Clearance

  • Different bidding and budget rules per tier

If everything sits in one or two PMax or Shopping campaigns with a single global ROAS target, you already know the answer.

3. PMax engineering credentials

Look for:

  • Documentation or case studies showing signal-based PMax setups

  • Use of offline conversions, value rules and customer lists

  • A testing roadmap for PMax (asset groups, audiences, creative packages, budget distribution)

For a solid external primer on PMax, you can cross-check with independent guides that break down how to structure campaigns and optimise them over time. PPC Geeks+2adchieve.com+2

4. Feed architecture and custom labels

You should see:

  • A clear schema for custom_label_0–4 that includes margin, lifecycle role and price band

  • Standardised rules for titles, descriptions and product_type, aligned with Google’s recommendations for Shopping feeds Google Help+1

  • Examples of how they optimise feeds for different categories and markets

5. SKU-level analysis and decision-making

Ask for a real (anonymised) example where they:

  • Cut back spend on a high-revenue SKU because POAS was weak

  • Scaled a high-margin SKU even though its ROAS looked average on the surface

  • Used SKU-level data to move products between campaigns and profit tiers

If they cannot talk about specific SKU-level decisions, they are probably optimising at the wrong altitude.

6. Testing discipline

You want to see:

  • A documented testing calendar

  • Clear hypotheses: “We are testing X to improve Y over Z period”

  • Experiments across feed, structure, bidding, creatives and audiences, not just tweaking budgets

7. Reporting that executives can actually use

Review a sample monthly pack:

  • Does page one show profit, POAS and contribution by channel / campaign?

  • Are there “Keep / Kill / Scale” recommendations with commercial context?

  • Does it separate brand vs non-brand, new vs returning, Shopping vs PMax vs Search?

If reporting is a pretty dashboard with no decisions attached, treat that as a warning sign.


Red flags that your current agency is burning profit


You do not have to be a PPC specialist to see trouble. Watch for these:

  1. Everything is “great” because ROAS is high, but gross profit in your P&L is flat

  2. You are told “PMax is a black box, we just have to trust it” with no mention of structured signals, feed work or account architecture Wall Street Journal+1

  3. Your Shopping setup consists of one or two campaigns for the whole catalogue

  4. They never ask for SKU-level margin or inventory data

  5. Monthly reports talk about “clicks, impressions and ROAS”, but not:

    • Margin

    • POAS

    • Incremental new customer revenue

  6. Every case study on their site is about ROAS, not profit or contribution margin

  7. You cannot clearly see how much budget is going to:

    • High-margin hero SKUs

    • Low-margin “vanity” products

    • Clearance or seasonal lines

If any of that feels familiar, you are not alone. Many brands discover this only when they run a proper profit audit of their Shopping and PMax activity.


“Great” ROAS, weak profit

Here is a simplified real scenario from a DTC brand that moved to a profit-first setup.

Before: ROAS-driven approach

  • Account ROAS: 6.8x

  • Shopping + PMax combined, one main profit-blind structure

  • 900+ SKUs, widely varied margins

  • Net result: POAS around 1.1–1.2x after accounting for product costs, shipping and discounting


When we overlaid margin data at SKU level, we found:

  • Top 20 SKUs by ad spend generated only 8% of total profit

  • High-margin SKUs that drove 40%+ of profit were receiving less than 12% of ad spend

  • Several “hero” lines with glossy ROAS figures were, in reality, barely breaking even per order


After: Profit-tiered architecture

We:

  • Divided SKUs into margin tiers (A/B/C)

  • Tagged products with custom labels for margin tier and strategy role (Acquisition / AOV builder / Retention / Clearance)

  • Built separate Shopping and PMax campaigns for each tier and role

  • Applied different bidding strategies and spend caps per tier

  • Rebalanced budget towards high-margin acquisition SKUs

Within 60 days:

  • Ad spend was roughly flat

  • Revenue dipped slightly (8–10%)

  • Gross profit from Google Ads increased by 30%+

  • POAS moved from roughly 1.1x to around 1.8x


ROAS fell on paper, but the P&L finally looked like growth instead of an expensive hobby.


How JudeLuxe approaches Google Shopping and PMax

JudeLuxe is an ecommerce PPC agency that exists for exactly this problem: too many brands stuck in ROAS theatre, not enough engineers working on profit. JudeLuxe+2JudeLuxe+2

A few specifics of how the agency works with Shopping and PMax:

  • Profit-first measurement: Every serious engagement moves quickly towards POAS, margin tiers and contribution views instead of surface-level ROAS

  • Signal-based PMax: Campaigns are built around structured signals, offline conversions and value-based bidding, rather than “let the machine run and hope for the best” JudeLuxe+1

  • Engineered feeds: Product feeds are treated as infrastructure, with custom labels and product types designed for bidding, not just for passing Google’s checks

  • SKU-level control: High-margin products get protected budget, low-margin and clearance lines are ring-fenced or constrained

  • Transparent reporting: Clients see where profit comes from and where it leaks, with clear Keep / Kill / Scale recommendations

If you want to see how your current Shopping and PMax setup performs on a profit basis, JudeLuxe offers a consultation focused on identifying hidden margin and scaling opportunities. JudeLuxe+1


How to run your own profit-driven agency comparison in 30 minutes


Here is a simple, repeatable process:

Step 1: Shortlist 3–5 agencies that specialise in ecommerce PPC

Look for:

  • Strong focus on ecommerce and Shopping

  • Content that talks about profit, margin and structure

  • Real case studies in your revenue band

Step 2: Send them the same brief

Include:

  • Monthly revenue and ad spend

  • High-level product and margin overview

  • Your growth targets

  • Access to a limited read-only Google Ads or data snapshot, if you are comfortable

Step 3: Ask them the same five questions

  1. How would you bring margin and POAS into our Shopping and PMax strategy?

  2. How would you structure our campaigns and custom labels for profit?

  3. How would you handle PMax vs Standard Shopping for our brand and why?

  4. What would your 90-day testing roadmap look like?

  5. Can you show an anonymised example of how you have moved budget from high-ROAS / low-profit SKUs to more profitable ones?

Step 4: Score answers against the Profit-Driven Evaluator Framework

Give each agency a simple score out of 10 for:

  • Measurement and strategy

  • PMax and Shopping engineering

  • Feed and data systems

  • Commercial alignment and transparency

The “best” agency will be obvious once you compare the depth and specificity of the answers.


FAQs about choosing a Google Shopping agency


Do I need a specialist Google Shopping agency or will any PPC agency do?

If you have a small catalogue and simple margins, a generalist might be fine. Once you are dealing with:

  • Hundreds or thousands of SKUs

  • Varied margin profiles

  • Multiple markets and feeds

Then you want a team that lives and breathes ecommerce Shopping and PMax. Google’s own Shopping and Merchant Center docs give you the sense of how many moving parts there are. Google Help+2Google Help+2


How do I know if an agency really understands Performance Max?

Check if they can explain:

  • How PMax works across Google’s inventory (Search, Shopping, YouTube, Display, Discover etc.) Google Help+1

  • How they feed offline conversion and first-party data into the system

  • How they prevent low-margin SKUs from hoarding budget

If their answer is just “we like PMax, it performs well”, that is not enough.


Should I ask agencies about awards and accreditations?

Awards and partner badges are fine as supporting signals, as long as the work behind them is aligned with your goals. For example, JudeLuxe’s nominations at the Global Search Awards reflect deep work on profit-first Shopping, feed engineering and data-led automation. JudeLuxe+1

Treat awards as a bonus, not as the main decision factor.


Next step: run a profit-first audit before you switch

Before you change agencies, do one thing:

Get a profit-based view of your current Google Shopping and PMax performance.

That means:

  • Exporting item-level performance data from Google Ads

  • Layering in your true product costs

  • Calculating POAS per SKU and per campaign

  • Identifying which SKUs and campaigns contribute the most profit, not just revenue

You can do this internally with your finance and growth team, or with a specialist partner.


If you want support from an agency already entrenched in profit-first ecommerce PPC, you can learn more about JudeLuxe’s approach on the main site, read the detailed breakdown on profit vs vanity metrics, or book a profit-focused consultation to review your current setup:

Once you have seen your true POAS and contribution by SKU, the phrase “best agency for Google Shopping ads” starts to look very different.

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page